HomeThe FirmOur PracticeAttorneysOffice LocationVictoriesResource LinksContact Us

FindLaw News

News

Drugs and Biotech

[08/15] Catalyst Pharmaceutical Partners Reports Second Quarter 2008 Financial Results
[08/14] PAREXEL Closes the Acquisition of ClinPhone
[08/14] Drugs as good as stents for many heart patients

More...

Personal Injury

[08/19] NY state firefighters deliver 3 babies in transit
[08/19] Suit accuses restaurant of giving man big tapeworm
[08/19] Sailor, knocked from boat, rescued 12 hours later

More...

Product Liability

[08/14] Judge lets Detroit mayor go to Democrat convention
[08/11] Authorities: Tire failure may be behind Nev. crash
[07/31] AP: Little progress in bridge repairs across US

More...

Top Headlines

[08/19] GM, Auditor to Pay $303 Million to Settle Shareholder Suits
[08/19] $5M Suit Filed Over New Orleans Oil Spill
[08/19] Use of Sexual-Conduct Evidence Prejudicial in Tire Defect Case

More...

Case Summaries

Elder Law

[05/13] Cao v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico
In an action wherein plaintiff sought recovery under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 for alleged constitutional violations along with several state law causes of action after she was removed from her home, made to undergo a psychological evaluation, and placed in a state institution for the elderly, dismissal of plaintiff's complaint is affirmed where: 1) the district court properly dismissed plaintiff's section 1983 claim as untimely; and 2) with no federal cause of action remaining, the district court acted within its discretion in declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over remaining state law claims.

[05/05] Miller v. Am. Airlines, Inc.
In a suit against American Airlines under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), summary judgment for defendants is affirmed where: 1) a collective bargaining agreement did not require that plaintiffs be offered positions of comparable pay past the retirement age; 2) a claim, that a supplement to the collective bargaining agreement governing the retirement of flight engineers was facially discriminatory, was not properly raised before the EEOC.

[03/11] Budnick v. Town of Carefree
In an action raising, inter alia, a claim that defendant-town violated the Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA) by denying plaintiffs a Special Use Permit (SUP) to build a multi-level continuing-care retirement community in the town, summary judgment against plaintiffs on the FHAA claim is affirmed where plaintiff failed to establish a discrimination claim under any of the theories of disparate treatment, disparate impact, or a failure to make reasonable accommodations. Potential residents of a retirement community do not presently qualify as disabled under the FHAA simply because some of them will become disabled as they age.

More...